On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary) < zachary.zelt...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> Section 1.5: > > “The client makes the following request at an arbitrary but reasonable > > interval which MUST NOT exceed the minimum interval rate provided by > > the authorization server (if present via the "interval" parameter).” > > > > My understanding is that the intervals between the client’s subsequent > requests must not be less than the value provided by the “interval” > parameter (if it is present). If that is correct than the intervals between > the subsequent requests MUST exceed (or be equal to) the value of the > “interval” parameter. > Thanks! Reworded to "The client makes the following request at an arbitrary but reasonable interval which MUST NOT be less than the minimum interval rate provided by the authorization server" Section 1.4: > > “interval > > OPTIONAL. The minimum amount of time in seconds that the > > client SHOULD wait between polling requests to the token > > endpoint” > > > > The definition uses the SHOULD requirement, while in section 1.5 the MUST > requirement is used. Should not the requirement be the same in both places? > Changed this should to a must. > > > Zachary > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf > Of *David Recordon > *Sent:* Thursday, July 15, 2010 3:47 PM > *To:* OAuth WG > *Cc:* Jim Brusstar > *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Device profile draft > > > > I've broken the device profile out of draft 06 so that it now lives in a > separate document as an extension and have updated it to fit into the draft > 10 structure. It defines a new "device endpoint" for the initial setup > request where the client gets the two codes and URL. It then uses the > existing token endpoint for polling for an access token. > > > > Jim is currently working on an implementation of it and we're generally > looking for feedback from implementors. The current polling mechanism hasn't > been tested in production deployments so it's possible that it may change in > future drafts. My goal is for this to become a working group draft. > > > > > http://github.com/daveman692/OAuth-2.0/raw/master/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-device-00.txt > > > > Thanks! > > > > --David >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
