A few questions we should answer before moving forward. Considering *your* use 
cases and reasons for being here:

1. Why are you here? What are you trying to solve that is not already addressed 
by existing specifications (OAuth 1.0a, WRAP, etc)?

2. Should the WG start by taking WRAP or OAuth 1.0a as its starting point? 
Something else?

3. If we start from draft-hammer-oauth, what needs to change to turn it into 
OAuth 2.0?

4. If we start from draft-hardt-oauth, what needs to change to turn it into 
OAuth 2.0?

5. Do you think the approach of working first on 'how to use a token' and then 
on 'how to get a token' is right?

6. Should we go back to working on a single specification?

7. Do you think the protocol should include a signature-based authentication 
scheme?

EHL
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to