thomasmueller commented on code in PR #2959:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/2959#discussion_r3428084593


##########
oak-parent/pom.xml:
##########
@@ -855,6 +879,166 @@
         <artifactId>jsr305</artifactId>
         <version>3.0.2</version>
       </dependency>
+      <!-- azure-keyvault-core:1.2.6 pulls guava:30.1.1-jre, conflicting with 
the direct guava
+           deps in oak-blob-cloud-azure and oak-segment-azure. Additionally, 
in reactor builds

Review Comment:
   See my first comments about embeds



##########
oak-parent/pom.xml:
##########
@@ -855,6 +879,166 @@
         <artifactId>jsr305</artifactId>
         <version>3.0.2</version>
       </dependency>
+      <!-- azure-keyvault-core:1.2.6 pulls guava:30.1.1-jre, conflicting with 
the direct guava
+           deps in oak-blob-cloud-azure and oak-segment-azure. Additionally, 
in reactor builds
+           Maven uses oak-shaded-guava's original pom.xml rather than 
dependency-reduced-pom.xml,
+           so guava:33.5.0-jre also appears as a transitive dep (making guava 
optional in
+           oak-shaded-guava would eliminate that false positive, but not the 
azure-keyvault conflict). -->
+      <dependency>
+        <groupId>com.google.guava</groupId>
+        <artifactId>guava</artifactId>
+        <version>33.5.0-jre</version>
+      </dependency>
+      <!-- jackrabbit-core:2.22.3 pulls oak-jackrabbit-api:1.88.0 -->
+      <dependency>
+        <groupId>org.apache.jackrabbit</groupId>
+        <artifactId>oak-jackrabbit-api</artifactId>
+        <version>${project.version}</version>
+      </dependency>
+      <!-- oak-auth-ldap has a direct dep on 2.12.0; api-all:2.0.1 pulls 2.8.0 
-->
+      <dependency>
+        <groupId>org.apache.commons</groupId>

Review Comment:
   See my first comments about embeds



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to