thomasmueller commented on code in PR #2959:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/2959#discussion_r3427875514


##########
oak-parent/pom.xml:
##########
@@ -855,6 +879,166 @@
         <artifactId>jsr305</artifactId>
         <version>3.0.2</version>
       </dependency>
+      <!-- azure-keyvault-core:1.2.6 pulls guava:30.1.1-jre, conflicting with 
the direct guava
+           deps in oak-blob-cloud-azure and oak-segment-azure. Additionally, 
in reactor builds
+           Maven uses oak-shaded-guava's original pom.xml rather than 
dependency-reduced-pom.xml,
+           so guava:33.5.0-jre also appears as a transitive dep (making guava 
optional in
+           oak-shaded-guava would eliminate that false positive, but not the 
azure-keyvault conflict). -->
+      <dependency>
+        <groupId>com.google.guava</groupId>
+        <artifactId>guava</artifactId>
+        <version>33.5.0-jre</version>
+      </dependency>
+      <!-- jackrabbit-core:2.22.3 pulls oak-jackrabbit-api:1.88.0 -->
+      <dependency>
+        <groupId>org.apache.jackrabbit</groupId>
+        <artifactId>oak-jackrabbit-api</artifactId>
+        <version>${project.version}</version>
+      </dependency>
+      <!-- oak-auth-ldap has a direct dep on 2.12.0; api-all:2.0.1 pulls 2.8.0 
-->
+      <dependency>
+        <groupId>org.apache.commons</groupId>
+        <artifactId>commons-pool2</artifactId>
+        <version>2.12.0</version>
+      </dependency>
+      <!-- oak-auth-ldap has a direct dep on 2.1.12; api-all:2.0.1 pulls 2.1.3 
-->
+      <dependency>
+        <groupId>org.apache.mina</groupId>
+        <artifactId>mina-core</artifactId>
+        <version>2.1.12</version>
+      </dependency>
+      <!-- parsson:1.0.5 pulls 2.0.2; elasticsearch-java:8.19.5 pulls 2.0.1 -->
+      <dependency>
+        <groupId>jakarta.json</groupId>
+        <artifactId>jakarta.json-api</artifactId>
+        <version>2.0.2</version>
+      </dependency>
+
+      <!-- jackrabbit-jcr-server:2.22.3 pulls tika-core:2.4.1; oak-lucene uses 
${tika.version} -->
+      <dependency>
+        <groupId>org.apache.tika</groupId>
+        <artifactId>tika-core</artifactId>
+        <version>${tika.version}</version>
+      </dependency>
+      <!-- jetty-annotations (via spring-boot-starter-jetty:2.7.18) pulls 9.6; 
tika-parsers:1.28.5 pulls 9.3 -->
+      <dependency>
+        <groupId>org.ow2.asm</groupId>
+        <artifactId>asm</artifactId>
+        <version>9.6</version>
+      </dependency>
+      <!-- poi:5.2.2 and poi-scratchpad:5.2.2 pull 2.17.2; xmlbeans:5.0.3 (via 
poi-ooxml) pulls 2.17.1 -->
+      <dependency>
+        <groupId>org.apache.logging.log4j</groupId>
+        <artifactId>log4j-api</artifactId>
+        <version>2.17.2</version>
+      </dependency>
+      <!-- oak-run has a direct dep on 1.3.4; aws-java-sdk-core:1.12.791 pulls 
1.1.3, httpclient pulls 1.2 -->
+      <dependency>
+        <groupId>commons-logging</groupId>
+        <artifactId>commons-logging</artifactId>
+        <version>1.3.4</version>
+      </dependency>
+      <!-- azure-identity:1.11.3 pulls 5.13.0; tika-parsers:1.28.5 pulls 
5.12.1 -->
+      <dependency>
+        <groupId>net.java.dev.jna</groupId>
+        <artifactId>jna</artifactId>
+        <version>5.13.0</version>
+      </dependency>
+      <!-- jackson-dataformat-xml:2.19.4 (via oak-segment-azure) pulls 7.1.1; 
tika-parsers:1.28.5 pulls 6.3.1 -->
+      <dependency>
+        <groupId>com.fasterxml.woodstox</groupId>
+        <artifactId>woodstox-core</artifactId>
+        <version>7.1.1</version>
+      </dependency>
+      <!-- aws-java-sdk-s3:1.12.791 pulls 2.12.7; edu.ucar:udunits (via 
tika-parsers) pulls 2.2 -->
+      <dependency>
+        <groupId>joda-time</groupId>
+        <artifactId>joda-time</artifactId>
+        <version>2.12.7</version>
+      </dependency>

Review Comment:
   I'll first try to make the build work, and then let me try removing it, and 
then we will see what happens :-)



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to