sanpwc commented on code in PR #4974:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/4974#discussion_r1898464919


##########
modules/client/src/test/java/org/apache/ignite/client/fakes/FakeInternalTable.java:
##########
@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ public CompletableFuture<BinaryRow> get(BinaryRowEx keyRow, 
@Nullable InternalTr
     public CompletableFuture<BinaryRow> get(
             BinaryRowEx keyRow,
             HybridTimestamp readTimestamp,
+            @Nullable UUID transactionId,

Review Comment:
   I saw you discussion with @vldpyatkov. Let it be the way you proposing now 
(readTimestamp + transactionId), but generally I believe that proposal that 
involves passing transaction is better. It's however out of scope of your PR. I 
see, you've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-24120



##########
modules/sql-engine/src/integrationTest/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/sql/sqllogic/ItSqlLogicTest.java:
##########
@@ -142,6 +143,8 @@
 @Tag("sqllogic")
 @ExtendWith({SystemPropertiesExtension.class, WorkDirectoryExtension.class})
 @WithSystemProperty(key = "IMPLICIT_PK_ENABLED", value = "true")
+// The following is to make sure we unlock LWM on data nodes promptly so that 
dropped tables are destroyed fast.
+@WithSystemProperty(key = 
ResourceVacuumManager.RESOURCE_VACUUM_INTERVAL_MILLISECONDS_PROPERTY, value = 
"1000")

Review Comment:
   I'd rather run corresponding tests multiple times on TC before merge in 
order to verify that they are stable. I do understand that it's just an 
interval though.



##########
modules/transactions/src/integrationTest/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/tx/readonly/ItReadOnlyTxAndLowWatermarkTest.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *      http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.ignite.internal.tx.readonly;
+
+import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS;
+import static java.util.stream.Collectors.toList;
+import static org.apache.ignite.internal.TestWrappers.unwrapIgniteImpl;
+import static 
org.apache.ignite.internal.TestWrappers.unwrapInternalTransaction;
+import static 
org.apache.ignite.internal.testframework.IgniteTestUtils.waitForCondition;
+import static 
org.apache.ignite.internal.testframework.matchers.CompletableFutureMatcher.willCompleteSuccessfully;
+import static org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat;
+import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.containsString;
+import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.hasToString;
+import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.is;
+import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.isA;
+import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertThrows;
+import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue;
+import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assumptions.assumeFalse;
+
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.stream.IntStream;
+import org.apache.ignite.Ignite;
+import org.apache.ignite.InitParametersBuilder;
+import org.apache.ignite.internal.ClusterPerTestIntegrationTest;
+import org.apache.ignite.internal.app.IgniteImpl;
+import org.apache.ignite.internal.hlc.HybridTimestamp;
+import org.apache.ignite.internal.lowwatermark.LowWatermarkImpl;
+import 
org.apache.ignite.internal.schema.configuration.GcExtensionConfiguration;
+import 
org.apache.ignite.internal.schema.configuration.LowWatermarkConfiguration;
+import org.apache.ignite.internal.testframework.WithSystemProperty;
+import org.apache.ignite.internal.tx.impl.ResourceVacuumManager;
+import org.apache.ignite.lang.ErrorGroups.Transactions;
+import org.apache.ignite.lang.IgniteException;
+import org.apache.ignite.sql.ResultSet;
+import org.apache.ignite.sql.SqlException;
+import org.apache.ignite.sql.SqlRow;
+import org.apache.ignite.table.KeyValueView;
+import org.apache.ignite.tx.Transaction;
+import org.apache.ignite.tx.TransactionException;
+import org.apache.ignite.tx.TransactionOptions;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
+import org.junit.jupiter.params.ParameterizedTest;
+import org.junit.jupiter.params.provider.EnumSource;
+import org.junitpioneer.jupiter.cartesian.CartesianTest;
+import org.junitpioneer.jupiter.cartesian.CartesianTest.Enum;
+import org.junitpioneer.jupiter.cartesian.CartesianTest.Values;
+
+class ItReadOnlyTxAndLowWatermarkTest extends ClusterPerTestIntegrationTest {
+    private static final String TABLE_NAME = "TEST_TABLE";
+
+    // 100 keys to make sure that at least one key ends up on every of 2 nodes.
+    private static final int KEY_COUNT = 100;
+
+    private static final long SHORT_DATA_AVAILABILITY_TIME_MS = 1000;
+
+    @Override
+    protected int initialNodes() {
+        // 2 nodes to have a non-coordinator node in cluster.
+        return 2;
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    protected void customizeInitParameters(InitParametersBuilder builder) {
+        builder.clusterConfiguration("ignite.gc.lowWatermark: {\n"
+                // Update frequently.
+                + "  updateInterval: 100\n"
+                + "}");
+    }
+
+    @BeforeEach
+    void createTable() {
+        node(0).sql().executeScript("CREATE TABLE " + TABLE_NAME + " (ID INT 
PRIMARY KEY, VAL VARCHAR)");
+    }
+
+    @ParameterizedTest
+    @EnumSource(TransactionalReader.class)
+    void 
roTransactionNoticesTupleVersionsMissingDueToGcOnDataNodes(TransactionalReader 
reader) throws Exception {
+        // TODO: remove the assumption when IGNITE-24119 is fixed.
+        assumeFalse(reader == TransactionalReader.MULTI_GET);
+
+        updateDataAvailabilityTimeToShortPeriod();
+
+        Ignite coordinator = node(0);
+        KeyValueView<Integer, String> kvView = kvView(coordinator);
+
+        insertOriginalValues(KEY_COUNT, kvView);
+
+        Transaction roTx = coordinator.transactions().begin(new 
TransactionOptions().readOnly(true));
+
+        updateToNewValues(KEY_COUNT, kvView);
+
+        waitTillLwmTriesToRaiseAndEraseOverrittenVersions();
+
+        IgniteException ex = assertThrows(IgniteException.class, () -> 
reader.read(coordinator, roTx));
+        assertThat(ex, isA(reader.sql() ? SqlException.class : 
TransactionException.class));
+        assertThat(ex, hasToString(containsString("Read timestamp is not 
available anymore.")));
+        assertThat("Wrong error code: " + ex.codeAsString(), ex.code(), 
is(Transactions.TX_STALE_READ_ONLY_OPERATION_ERR));
+    }
+
+    private void updateDataAvailabilityTimeToShortPeriod() {
+        IgniteImpl igniteImpl = unwrapIgniteImpl(node(0));
+
+        LowWatermarkConfiguration lwmConfig = igniteImpl.clusterConfiguration()
+                .getConfiguration(GcExtensionConfiguration.KEY)
+                .gc()
+                .lowWatermark();
+
+        
assertThat(lwmConfig.dataAvailabilityTime().update(SHORT_DATA_AVAILABILITY_TIME_MS),
 willCompleteSuccessfully());
+    }
+
+    private static KeyValueView<Integer, String> kvView(Ignite coordinator) {
+        return 
coordinator.tables().table(TABLE_NAME).keyValueView(Integer.class, 
String.class);
+    }
+
+    private static void insertOriginalValues(int keyCount, 
KeyValueView<Integer, String> kvView) {
+        for (int i = 0; i < keyCount; i++) {
+            kvView.put(null, i, "original-" + i);
+        }
+    }
+
+    private static void updateToNewValues(int keyCount, KeyValueView<Integer, 
String> kvView) {
+        for (int i = 0; i < keyCount; i++) {
+            kvView.put(null, i, "updated-" + i);
+        }
+    }
+
+    private static void waitTillLwmTriesToRaiseAndEraseOverrittenVersions() 
throws InterruptedException {
+        Thread.sleep(2 * SHORT_DATA_AVAILABILITY_TIME_MS);
+    }
+
+    @CartesianTest
+    @WithSystemProperty(key = 
ResourceVacuumManager.RESOURCE_VACUUM_INTERVAL_MILLISECONDS_PROPERTY, value = 
"100")
+    void lwmIsAllowedToBeRaisedOnDataNodesAfterRoTransactionFinish(

Review Comment:
   I'm curios how it's expected to work in case of abandoned RO transactions? I 
mean transactions that lost their coordinators. I believe that we should add 
test for such scenario.



##########
modules/table/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/table/distributed/replicator/PartitionReplicaListener.java:
##########
@@ -3983,14 +3986,65 @@ private CompletableFuture<?> 
processOperationRequestWithTxRwCounter(
             }
         }
 
-        return processOperationRequest(senderId, request, isPrimary, 
opStartTsIfDirectRo, leaseStartTime)
-                .whenComplete((unused, throwable) -> {
-                    if (request instanceof ReadWriteReplicaRequest) {
-                        txRwOperationTracker.decrementOperationCount(
-                                rwTxActiveCatalogVersion(catalogService, 
(ReadWriteReplicaRequest) request)
-                        );
-                    }
-                });
+        UUID txIdLockingLwm = tryToLockLwmIfNeeded(request, 
opStartTsIfDirectRo);
+
+        try {
+            return processOperationRequest(senderId, request, isPrimary, 
opStartTsIfDirectRo, leaseStartTime)
+                    .whenComplete((unused, throwable) -> {
+                        unlockLwmIfNeeded(txIdLockingLwm, request);
+
+                        if (request instanceof ReadWriteReplicaRequest) {
+                            txRwOperationTracker.decrementOperationCount(
+                                    rwTxActiveCatalogVersion(catalogService, 
(ReadWriteReplicaRequest) request)
+                            );
+                        }
+                    });
+        } catch (Throwable e) {
+            try {
+                unlockLwmIfNeeded(txIdLockingLwm, request);
+            } catch (Throwable unlockProblem) {
+                e.addSuppressed(unlockProblem);
+            }
+            throw e;
+        }
+    }
+
+    private static UUID newFakeTxId() {

Review Comment:
   Could you please add a javadoc or a comment that will explain why we need 
such method.



##########
modules/transactions/src/integrationTest/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/tx/readonly/ItReadOnlyTxAndLowWatermarkTest.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *      http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.ignite.internal.tx.readonly;
+
+import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS;
+import static java.util.stream.Collectors.toList;
+import static org.apache.ignite.internal.TestWrappers.unwrapIgniteImpl;
+import static 
org.apache.ignite.internal.TestWrappers.unwrapInternalTransaction;
+import static 
org.apache.ignite.internal.testframework.IgniteTestUtils.waitForCondition;
+import static 
org.apache.ignite.internal.testframework.matchers.CompletableFutureMatcher.willCompleteSuccessfully;
+import static org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat;
+import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.containsString;
+import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.hasToString;
+import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.is;
+import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.isA;
+import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertThrows;
+import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue;
+import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assumptions.assumeFalse;
+
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.stream.IntStream;
+import org.apache.ignite.Ignite;
+import org.apache.ignite.InitParametersBuilder;
+import org.apache.ignite.internal.ClusterPerTestIntegrationTest;
+import org.apache.ignite.internal.app.IgniteImpl;
+import org.apache.ignite.internal.hlc.HybridTimestamp;
+import org.apache.ignite.internal.lowwatermark.LowWatermarkImpl;
+import 
org.apache.ignite.internal.schema.configuration.GcExtensionConfiguration;
+import 
org.apache.ignite.internal.schema.configuration.LowWatermarkConfiguration;
+import org.apache.ignite.internal.testframework.WithSystemProperty;
+import org.apache.ignite.internal.tx.impl.ResourceVacuumManager;
+import org.apache.ignite.lang.ErrorGroups.Transactions;
+import org.apache.ignite.lang.IgniteException;
+import org.apache.ignite.sql.ResultSet;
+import org.apache.ignite.sql.SqlException;
+import org.apache.ignite.sql.SqlRow;
+import org.apache.ignite.table.KeyValueView;
+import org.apache.ignite.tx.Transaction;
+import org.apache.ignite.tx.TransactionException;
+import org.apache.ignite.tx.TransactionOptions;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
+import org.junit.jupiter.params.ParameterizedTest;
+import org.junit.jupiter.params.provider.EnumSource;
+import org.junitpioneer.jupiter.cartesian.CartesianTest;
+import org.junitpioneer.jupiter.cartesian.CartesianTest.Enum;
+import org.junitpioneer.jupiter.cartesian.CartesianTest.Values;
+
+class ItReadOnlyTxAndLowWatermarkTest extends ClusterPerTestIntegrationTest {
+    private static final String TABLE_NAME = "TEST_TABLE";
+
+    // 100 keys to make sure that at least one key ends up on every of 2 nodes.

Review Comment:
   Do you assert that prerequisite in test? If not, I'd rather add such 
assertion.



##########
modules/table/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/table/distributed/replicator/PartitionReplicaListener.java:
##########
@@ -534,7 +540,7 @@ private CompletableFuture<?> processRequest(ReplicaRequest 
request, @Nullable Bo
         // Don't need to validate schema.
         if (opTs == null) {
             assert opTsIfDirectRo == null;
-            return processOperationRequestWithTxRwCounter(senderId, request, 
isPrimary, null, leaseStartTime);
+            return processOperationRequestWithWrappingLogic(senderId, request, 
isPrimary, null, leaseStartTime);

Review Comment:
   I don't like the postfix "WithWrappingLogic", wrapping is very general term 
and thus such postfix says nothing.



##########
modules/table/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/table/distributed/replicator/PartitionReplicaListener.java:
##########
@@ -3983,14 +3986,65 @@ private CompletableFuture<?> 
processOperationRequestWithTxRwCounter(
             }
         }
 
-        return processOperationRequest(senderId, request, isPrimary, 
opStartTsIfDirectRo, leaseStartTime)
-                .whenComplete((unused, throwable) -> {
-                    if (request instanceof ReadWriteReplicaRequest) {
-                        txRwOperationTracker.decrementOperationCount(
-                                rwTxActiveCatalogVersion(catalogService, 
(ReadWriteReplicaRequest) request)
-                        );
-                    }
-                });
+        UUID txIdLockingLwm = tryToLockLwmIfNeeded(request, 
opStartTsIfDirectRo);
+
+        try {
+            return processOperationRequest(senderId, request, isPrimary, 
opStartTsIfDirectRo, leaseStartTime)
+                    .whenComplete((unused, throwable) -> {
+                        unlockLwmIfNeeded(txIdLockingLwm, request);

Review Comment:
   I don't like the fact that we detect whether we need to do action on 
different abstraction levels.
   `unlockLwmIfNeeded` hides `if (request instanceof 
ReadOnlyDirectReplicaRequest) `
   but `if (request instanceof ReadWriteReplicaRequest)` is right in front of 
us. We should either hide both or expose both. In order to have symmetry with 
tryToLockLwmIfNeeded, I'd prefer hiding both in given case.



##########
modules/transactions/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/tx/impl/ResourceVacuumManager.java:
##########
@@ -105,7 +108,7 @@ public ResourceVacuumManager(
                 transactionInflights
         );
         this.finishedTransactionBatchRequestHandler =
-                new FinishedTransactionBatchRequestHandler(messagingService, 
resourceRegistry, resourceVacuumExecutor);
+                new FinishedTransactionBatchRequestHandler(messagingService, 
resourceRegistry, lowWatermark, resourceVacuumExecutor);

Review Comment:
   I prefer one at a line in case of >3 params.



##########
modules/table/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/table/distributed/replicator/PartitionReplicaListener.java:
##########
@@ -2196,9 +2202,6 @@ private <T> CompletableFuture<T> appendTxCommand(
                                         }))
                 );
             }
-        } catch (Exception e) {

Review Comment:
   What will happen if cursor related exception will be thrown? Or it's not 
possible?



##########
modules/table/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/table/distributed/replicator/PartitionReplicaListener.java:
##########
@@ -3983,14 +3986,65 @@ private CompletableFuture<?> 
processOperationRequestWithTxRwCounter(
             }
         }
 
-        return processOperationRequest(senderId, request, isPrimary, 
opStartTsIfDirectRo, leaseStartTime)
-                .whenComplete((unused, throwable) -> {
-                    if (request instanceof ReadWriteReplicaRequest) {
-                        txRwOperationTracker.decrementOperationCount(
-                                rwTxActiveCatalogVersion(catalogService, 
(ReadWriteReplicaRequest) request)
-                        );
-                    }
-                });
+        UUID txIdLockingLwm = tryToLockLwmIfNeeded(request, 
opStartTsIfDirectRo);
+
+        try {
+            return processOperationRequest(senderId, request, isPrimary, 
opStartTsIfDirectRo, leaseStartTime)
+                    .whenComplete((unused, throwable) -> {
+                        unlockLwmIfNeeded(txIdLockingLwm, request);
+
+                        if (request instanceof ReadWriteReplicaRequest) {
+                            txRwOperationTracker.decrementOperationCount(
+                                    rwTxActiveCatalogVersion(catalogService, 
(ReadWriteReplicaRequest) request)
+                            );
+                        }
+                    });
+        } catch (Throwable e) {
+            try {
+                unlockLwmIfNeeded(txIdLockingLwm, request);
+            } catch (Throwable unlockProblem) {
+                e.addSuppressed(unlockProblem);
+            }
+            throw e;
+        }
+    }
+
+    private static UUID newFakeTxId() {
+        return UUID.randomUUID();
+    }
+
+    private @Nullable UUID tryToLockLwmIfNeeded(ReplicaRequest request, 
@Nullable HybridTimestamp opStartTsIfDirectRo) {

Review Comment:
   Could you please add a javadoc that will explain when we do lock the LWM and 
when we unlock it? Basically, explanation that you have in PR, seems perfect 
here.
   
   > When executing an operation in an RO transaction (explicit or implicit), 
attempt to lock LWM on the data node where it's executed
   If lock attempt fails, throw an exception with a specific error code
   When cleaning up after an RO transaction had been finished, unlock LWM on 
each node where such a cleanup happens
   For direct RO operations (which happen in implicit RO transactions), unlock 
LWM right after the read has been done on the data node



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@ignite.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to