ascherbakoff commented on code in PR #4821:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/4821#discussion_r1891937945


##########
modules/raft-api/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/raft/Command.java:
##########
@@ -17,10 +17,27 @@
 
 package org.apache.ignite.internal.raft;
 
+import org.apache.ignite.internal.hlc.HybridTimestamp;
 import org.apache.ignite.internal.network.NetworkMessage;
+import org.jetbrains.annotations.Nullable;
 
 /**
  * A marker interface for replication group command.
  */
 public interface Command extends NetworkMessage {
+    /**
+     * This is called before a command is submitted to replication pipeline.
+     *
+     * @param safeTs Safe timestamp.
+     */
+    default void patch(HybridTimestamp safeTs) {}

Review Comment:
   We already have this concept. See patchCommandBeforeApply. This looks really 
ugly.
   My PR actually makes this concept clean. 
   Patching is hidden on replication layer and not visible outside. Message may 
or may not be patched, depending on protocol requirements. It still remains 
immutable then it enters messaging layer on initiator side.
   No known to me thread safety issues exist in the PR.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@ignite.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to