Duansg commented on issue #3961:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/issues/3961#issuecomment-3741429707
> I'd love to hear your thoughts on this approach.
Hi, thank you for your reply. Yes, TDengine is indeed not part of our
long-term plans going forward. However, what I meant to convey is:
If you generate a table according to the new rules, even if you fix the
type, the insertion will still fail because the table has already been created
and its type cannot be modified.
Adding a fallback strategy would require catching and handling exceptions.
Since version 1.8.0 was just released, implementing such a heavyweight solution
isn't necessary. Could we instead consider modifying the dynamic table name
generation strategy? After all, this requires no additional user intervention.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
