Se i sofisti avessero avuto i soldi dei GAFAM, Socrate, Platone e Aristotele avebbero lavorato per loro :-)
G. Il Ven 22 Mar 2024, 10:30 380° <g...@biscuolo.net> ha scritto: > Buongiorno, > > grazie mille della segnalazione > > Enrico Nardelli <narde...@mat.uniroma2.it> writes: > > [...] > > > a deep dive into speculations about AGI reveals that many AI > > practitioners have starkly different views on the nature of intelligence > > than do those who study human and animal cognition—differences that > > matter for understanding the present and predicting the likely future of > > machine intelligence. > > _taggo_ questo concetto > > > Continua qua https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ado7069 > > My personal humble executive summary: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > > The definition of AGI was adjusted accordingly to include only so-called > “cognitive tasks.” DeepMind cofounder Demis Hassabis defines AGI as a > system that “should be able to do pretty much any cognitive task that > humans can do,” and OpenAI describes it as “highly autonomous systems > that outperform humans at most economically valuable work,” where “most” > leaves out tasks requiring the physical intelligence that will likely > elude robots for some time. > > The notion of “intelligence” in AI—cognitive or otherwise—is often > framed in terms of an individual agent optimizing for a reward or > goal. One influential paper defined general intelligence as “an agent’s > ability to achieve goals in a wide range of environments”; another > stated that “intelligence, and its associated abilities, can be > understood as subserving the maximisation of reward.” Indeed, this is > how current-day AI works—the computer program AlphaGo, for example, is > trained to optimize a particular reward function (“win the game”), and > GPT-4 is trained to optimize another kind of reward function (“predict > the next word in a phrase”). > > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Ho già detto in altre occasioni che una efficace caratterizzazione dei > sistemi LLM è "macchine sofistiche", perché - perdonatemi la > banalizzazione - per i sofisti non è importante comprendere la verità ma > solo /dipinger(se)la/, /narrar(se)la/. > > Analogamente, più osservo il dibattito sulla AGI più mi convinco che si > tratti solo e soltanto di meta-sofismo, ovvero sofismo sul sofismo, cioè > sofismo al quadrato: non importa comprendere cosa sia l'intelligenza o > cosa siano le capacità cognitive, i meta-sofisti l'intelligenza "se la > cantano e se la suonano". > > Di questo stiamo parlando: meta-sofismo on steroids. > > [...] > > Saluti, 380° > > -- > 380° (Giovanni Biscuolo public alter ego) > > «Noi, incompetenti come siamo, > non abbiamo alcun titolo per suggerire alcunché» > > Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice > but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>. > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa@server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >
_______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
