On 11 Feb, Richard Porter wrote in message
<564212a451.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>:
> On 11 Feb 2011 Michael Drake wrote:
>
> > Out of interest, what speed do you get if you set "incremental_reflow"
> > to "0" in the Choices file? If your test pages have changed, please
> > test again with the original settings first.
>
> Wow! 8s and 6s respectively - infinitely better on all counts! This should
> be the default, or at least it should be in one of the configuration
> subwindows.
Is there any reason why we wouldn't want users to mess with this option? If
not, I'll add it to the RISC OS config interface as it looks as if it could
be useful on the slower hardware.
--
Steve Fryatt - Leeds, England Wakefield Acorn & RISC OS Show
Saturday 16 April 2011
http://www.stevefryatt.org.uk/ http://www.wakefieldshow.org.uk/
