On 11 Feb 2011 Michael Drake wrote: > In article <564212a451.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>, > Richard Porter <r...@minijem.plus.com> wrote: >> On 11 Feb 2011 Michael Drake wrote:
>>> Out of interest, what speed do you get if you set "incremental_reflow" >>> to "0" in the Choices file? If your test pages have changed, please >>> test again with the original settings first. >> Wow! 8s and 6s respectively - infinitely better on all counts! > Interesting. >> Incremental reflow might enable you to see some images before the >> whole lot are downloaded but it isn't worth the candle unless you're >> running on really fast hardware. > I'm not sure there isn't something strange happening on your system. I hope not, but the Iyonix should be a bit faster than a RiscPC with a Vpod (1280x1024, 16M colours if it matters). > On my system (an Iyonix), your url[1] loads with incremental reflow > enabled in less than 4s. > 1: > http://www.minimarcos.org.uk/cgi-bin/forum/Blah.pl?,b=MM,v=display,m=1 > 296606335,s=4,highlight=#num4 Try the other test. Go to http://www.minimarcos.org.uk/galleries.html and click on the link "Mk.VI". This takes you to the bottom of a largish thumbnail index. It was taking a lot of time to reformat the table, redraw the page and then reposition it to the on-page name tag every few images. -- Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/ mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com I don't want a "user experience" - I just want stuff that works.
