Thanks Ram! I think the "Hybrid Cloud Service" is exactly what I meant for "Cloud Bridging", so we should probably merge those two sessions as well. On higher layer network services (e.g.: NAT, Firewall, Acceleration), we might probably want to consider a distinct session for each service. For Load Balancing, we should keep in mind that there is already an ecosystem project (in FutureStack) covering this: Atlas-LB.
Cheers, Salvatore From: Ram Durairaj (radurair) [mailto:radur...@cisco.com] Sent: 19 September 2011 16:41 To: Salvatore Orlando; netstack@lists.launchpad.net Cc: Thierry Carrez Subject: RE: [Netstack] Proposing sessions for Openstack design summitq Hi Salvatore: Yes. Let's converge on the core topics. Quickly on Hybrid Cloud Framework - This Service will enable Enterprises to extend their Private Cloud/DC network to Public Cloud Network Infra. The objective of the project is provide a abstraction level of APIs as in the case of Quantum for Enterprise extensions over WAN, DC interconnects and so on..irrespective of the underlying scheme, IPSEC or MPLS VPN and so on. This is work in progress internally and hope to share the proposal/ blueprint in next few days for the community review. Ram From: Salvatore Orlando [mailto:salvatore.orla...@eu.citrix.com] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 8:36 AM To: Ram Durairaj (radurair); netstack@lists.launchpad.net Cc: Thierry Carrez Subject: RE: [Netstack] Proposing sessions for Openstack design summitq Hi Ram, Thanks for sharing your proposed sessions for the design summit. I think that for this summit we will not be creating blueprints and them propose them for "sprint" as we did for Diablo, but we should rather propose sessions on the summit.openstack.org/sessions. However, since we are going to have our own track, it will be good to hear some organizational details from Thierry how many sessions we can fit in it. All the elements in your list make perfect sense for me. However, I'm afraid I do not understand very well what do you mean by "Hybrid Cloud Service Framework". Can you elaborate a bit more on this? I think your list is not very far from mine, and we can probably merge them as follows: 1. L3 networking services (beyond IPAM) 2. Higher layer network services (L4/L7) 1. Firewall and Security Groups 2. Network Acceleration Services Insertion Framework LB, Symmetric services - Acceleration services and so on 3. NAT 4. VPN Access 3. Quantum "Basic" Plugin 1. Linux Bridge 2. Solution supporting all hypervisor platforms including ESX/Hyper-V 4. Hybrid Cloud Service Framework 5. Quantum API v1.1 1. Synchronous vs Asynchronous behaviour and concept of "Operational Status" 2. Improvements such as Filtering, Rate Limiting, Resource Links, pagination 6. Cloud Bridging APIs in Quantum From: Ram Durairaj (radurair) [mailto:radur...@cisco.com] Sent: 19 September 2011 16:21 To: Salvatore Orlando; netstack@lists.launchpad.net Cc: Thierry Carrez Subject: RE: [Netstack] Proposing sessions for Openstack design summitq Hello Salvatore and all: We suppose to have a Netstack track...Its good to follow-up with Thierry to group all the Net stack related blueprint and sessions in one track for all the interested community participants to contribute and discuss. In addition to the list, here are few more items from our side: 1. L3 Service - As a service as Quantum 2. Hybrid Cloud Service Framework 3. Network Acceleration Services Insertion Framework (LB, Symmetric services - Acceleration services and so on) 4. Quantum Asynchronous API mode 5. Quantum Security Groups support 6. Quantum "Basic Plugin (Linux bridge?) Few more services we are discussing internally and we will add them here. Thanks Ram From: netstack-bounces+radurair=cisco....@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:netstack-bounces+radurair=cisco....@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Salvatore Orlando Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 7:49 AM To: netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: [Netstack] Proposing sessions for Openstack design summitq Hello fellow NetStackers, The list of proposed session at http://summit.openstack.org/sessions is filling up, and I think it is time we start proposing our own sessions as well. Actually, there are already two accepted sessions for NetStack: 1. Donabe/API models: http://summit.openstack.org/sessions/view/29 2. Continuous integration planning: http://summit.openstack.org/sessions/view/35 On top of these two, I would also consider having the following sessions (in order of importance): 1. Higher layer network services (L4/L7), e.g.: Firewall, NAT, VPN 2. Improved authorization framework for Quantum, with a full RBAC model. 3. Quantum API v1.1 a. Synchronous vs Asynchronous behaviour and concept of "Operational Status" b. Improvements such as Filtering, Rate Limiting, Resource Links, pagination 4. Cloud Bridging APIs in Quantum What's your opinion? Cheers, Salvatore
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
