On Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:28:01 GMT, Marcono1234 <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   improve the text
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/net/Socket.java line 1756:
> 
>> 1754:      * independent of each other. Irrespective of whether or not the 
>> socket
>> 1755:      * is {@linkplain #close() closed}, this method will return {@code 
>> true} only
>> 1756:      * if a prior call to {@linkplain  #shutdownInput() 
>> shutdownInput()}
> 
> Since the link text is the method name (even including the `()`), would 
> `@link` instead of `@linkplain` be more appropriate, to have it formatted as 
> code?
> Suggestion:
> 
>      * if a prior call to {@link #shutdownInput()}
> 
> 
> Same applies to `isOutputShutdown`.
> 
> (This is just a suggestion; feel free to ignore.)

Yes - it should be `{@link ... }` sorry I missed that! Same for other method 
references in the new text.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31000#discussion_r3168725016

Reply via email to