On 13 Nov 2015, at 04:59, Sebastian Sickelmann <sebastian.sickelm...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi, > > my recordings related to this thread show me that this thread is open. Sorry > for loosing track for some time. > > If i am right i got an thumbs up review result from Chris Hegarty for an > older patch http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/4906983.1/ (pending the outcome > of the mail-exchange with Mark-Sheppard). > @Chris: Am i right in my assumption? Is this still valid? > > The result on the pending mail-exchange is in the > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/4906983.3/ I’m ok with this latest version. -Chris. > @Mark: Are you ok, with the provided patch? > > @David: Thanks for hosting the webrevs for me and suggesting that i try to > become an author of OpenJDK. > > As I am now an author, i would like to create a jdk-changeset (depending on a > positive review result) and host it on my cr.openjdk.java.net account. > I would list Chris and Mark as reviewers. > > @David: Are you still ok with supporting me to push this changeset depending > on a positive review result? Are you ok to be mentioned as reviewer too? I > haven't found any review statement from your site. Thanks again for your > great support getting me up and running with the openjdk infrastructure. > > Thanks > Sebastian > > > On 09/16/2015 04:27 PM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> here is the updated webrev: >> >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/4906983.3/ >> >> >> Hope the comments are fine now. >> >> What would be the normal procedure in net-dev for accepting a change (a >> 2 group-member thumbs-up like in core-libs)? >> >> -- Sebastian >> >> .........cleared long thread............... please see mailing-list-archive >> for details >> >> >
