I was thinking as a change for all constructors, as there are URL, which may overload authority part's structural elements such that port might be
a "remote object id", or some other form of token.
OK, that's fine On 13/09/2015 15:25, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Is this suggested wording for the “spec” accepting constructors? I think what we have for the constructors accepting protocol, host, port, etc, is more accurate.
