yes that's fine with me also
regards
Mark
On 15/12/2015 15:04, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 13 Nov 2015, at 04:59, Sebastian Sickelmann <sebastian.sickelm...@gmx.de>
wrote:
Hi,
my recordings related to this thread show me that this thread is open. Sorry
for loosing track for some time.
If i am right i got an thumbs up review result from Chris Hegarty for an older
patch http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/4906983.1/ (pending the outcome of the
mail-exchange with Mark-Sheppard).
@Chris: Am i right in my assumption? Is this still valid?
The result on the pending mail-exchange is in the
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/4906983.3/
I’m ok with this latest version.
-Chris.
@Mark: Are you ok, with the provided patch?
@David: Thanks for hosting the webrevs for me and suggesting that i try to
become an author of OpenJDK.
As I am now an author, i would like to create a jdk-changeset (depending on a
positive review result) and host it on my cr.openjdk.java.net account.
I would list Chris and Mark as reviewers.
@David: Are you still ok with supporting me to push this changeset depending on
a positive review result? Are you ok to be mentioned as reviewer too? I haven't
found any review statement from your site. Thanks again for your great support
getting me up and running with the openjdk infrastructure.
Thanks
Sebastian
On 09/16/2015 04:27 PM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
Hi,
here is the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/4906983.3/
Hope the comments are fine now.
What would be the normal procedure in net-dev for accepting a change (a
2 group-member thumbs-up like in core-libs)?
-- Sebastian
.........cleared long thread............... please see mailing-list-archive for
details
