Hi, I want to ask if we can make any progress with this javadoc- and test-only change.
Are you ok with the provided patch? @Chris and Mark: Can i create a changeset that lists you as reviewer? -- Sebastian On 11/13/2015 05:59 AM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote: > Hi, > > my recordings related to this thread show me that this thread is open. > Sorry for loosing track for some time. > > If i am right i got an thumbs up review result from Chris Hegarty for > an older patch http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/4906983.1/ (pending > the outcome of the mail-exchange with Mark-Sheppard). > @Chris: Am i right in my assumption? Is this still valid? > > The result on the pending mail-exchange is in the > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/4906983.3/ > @Mark: Are you ok, with the provided patch? > > @David: Thanks for hosting the webrevs for me and suggesting that i > try to become an author of OpenJDK. > > As I am now an author, i would like to create a jdk-changeset > (depending on a positive review result) and host it on my > cr.openjdk.java.net account. > I would list Chris and Mark as reviewers. > > @David: Are you still ok with supporting me to push this changeset > depending on a positive review result? Are you ok to be mentioned as > reviewer too? I haven't found any review statement from your site. > Thanks again for your great support getting me up and running with the > openjdk infrastructure. > > Thanks > Sebastian > > > On 09/16/2015 04:27 PM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> here is the updated webrev: >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/4906983.3/ >> >> Hope the comments are fine now. >> >> What would be the normal procedure in net-dev for accepting a change (a >> 2 group-member thumbs-up like in core-libs)? >> >> -- Sebastian >> >> .........cleared long thread............... please see mailing-list-archive >> for details >> >
