Oh that's disturbing . We just signed up a few months ago for a circuit
at an MMR and are still waiting for delivery.
Matt.
On 17/10/18 10:23 am, Ben Cannon wrote:
Oh how funny I’m working on a billing issue with them for a circuit they turned
up but didn’t connect to the MMR for 2 months...
-Ben
On Oct 16, 2018, at 3:20 PM, Matt Erculiani <merculi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Speaking of Cogent service (and I know you guys are watching), I'd love
to get someone's help off-list turning up a p2p that has been moved to
billing despite being told loud and clear it doesn't work. I
half-expected it to not work when I found out there was a type 2
provider involved, but I definitely did not expect to be billed for
it...
-Matt
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 12:09 PM Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net> wrote:
Agreed. A couple IXes, Cogent, HE, and a couple others. Add more IXes and
others as needed. Eyeballs should be fine with the above.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
________________________________
From: "Daniel Corbe" <dco...@hammerfiber.com>
To: "DaKnOb" <daknob....@gmail.com>
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 10:44:10 AM
Subject: Re: Whats going on at Cogent
at 11:34 AM, DaKnOb <daknob....@gmail.com> wrote:
I guess people really don’t like Cogent judging by the fact that one
unrelated email caused all this to happen again.. :-)
Cogent have more pain points on average but they’re still the best option
for getting to other Cogent customers. It’s not really hard to design
around their shortcomings. I’d rather have 30 small links and be
well-connected than two large ones and be SOL because someone refuses to
peer.
I can’t speak to their MPLS service, because cogent’s the last company I’d
ever trust with my backbone.
--
/* Matt Perkins
Direct 1300 137 379 Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.
Office 1300 133 299 m...@spectrum.com.au
Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
Spectrum Networks is a member of the Communications Alliance & TIO
*/
