Oh how funny I’m working on a billing issue with them for a circuit they turned up but didn’t connect to the MMR for 2 months...
-Ben > On Oct 16, 2018, at 3:20 PM, Matt Erculiani <merculi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Speaking of Cogent service (and I know you guys are watching), I'd love > to get someone's help off-list turning up a p2p that has been moved to > billing despite being told loud and clear it doesn't work. I > half-expected it to not work when I found out there was a type 2 > provider involved, but I definitely did not expect to be billed for > it... > > -Matt >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 12:09 PM Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net> wrote: >> >> Agreed. A couple IXes, Cogent, HE, and a couple others. Add more IXes and >> others as needed. Eyeballs should be fine with the above. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> Midwest-IX >> http://www.midwest-ix.com >> >> ________________________________ >> From: "Daniel Corbe" <dco...@hammerfiber.com> >> To: "DaKnOb" <daknob....@gmail.com> >> Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 10:44:10 AM >> Subject: Re: Whats going on at Cogent >> >> at 11:34 AM, DaKnOb <daknob....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I guess people really don’t like Cogent judging by the fact that one >>> unrelated email caused all this to happen again.. :-) >> >> Cogent have more pain points on average but they’re still the best option >> for getting to other Cogent customers. It’s not really hard to design >> around their shortcomings. I’d rather have 30 small links and be >> well-connected than two large ones and be SOL because someone refuses to >> peer. >> >> I can’t speak to their MPLS service, because cogent’s the last company I’d >> ever trust with my backbone. >> >> >> >>