> On Mar 1, 2018, at 6:30 PM, Harald Koch <c...@pobox.com> wrote: > > On 1 March 2018 at 18:48, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: > >> ULA provide stable internal addresses which survive changing ISP >> for the average home user. > > > Yeah this is pretty much what I'm doing. ULA for stable, internal addresses > that I can put into the (internal) DNS: ISP prefixes for global routing. > Renumbering is hard. > > All of the objections I've seen to ULA are actually objections to (IPv6) > NAT, which is why I was confused.
I object to NAT more strongly than ULA, but IMHO, even if you aren’t going to route it, a block of GUA PI makes more sense than ULA for virtually any installation I can imagine. Owen
