On 1 March 2018 at 15:18, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote:

> Second, RFC-1918 doesn’t apply to IPv6 at all, and (fortunately) hardly
> anyone
> uses ULA (the IPv6 analogue to RFC-1918).
>

Wait. What's the objection to ULA? Is it just that NAT is bad, or is there
something new?

-- 
Harald

Reply via email to