On 1 March 2018 at 15:18, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > Second, RFC-1918 doesn’t apply to IPv6 at all, and (fortunately) hardly > anyone > uses ULA (the IPv6 analogue to RFC-1918). >
Wait. What's the objection to ULA? Is it just that NAT is bad, or is there something new? -- Harald