On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:20:08 -0400, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote:
That's the big difference - IPv6 has been designed to provide abundant
address space.
There is no amount of fixed address space that can't be consumed with
stupid allocation policies.
True. However, are you making the argument that any of the current or
proposed allocation policies are, in fact, stupid in such a way that
this is likely?
What seems like a great idea today becomes tomorrow's "what the f*** were
they thinking".
