Faisal, On Oct 8, 2014, at 9:45 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappytelecom.net> wrote: > So, this is more of a 'opinion' / 'feel' (with all due respect) comment, and > not something which has a (presently) compelling technical reasoning behind > it ?
The technical reasoning behind /48 has been documented in many places. Lots of folks, particularly those who’ve struggled with justifying their “need” for IPv4 have developed “‘opinion’ / ‘feel’” about conserving address space. If you remove the limitations of IPv4 in terms of quantity of address space, what are the compelling technical reasons for longer than /48? Regards, -drc
