On Oct 8, 2014, at 11:54 PM, Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> wrote: > On (2014-10-09 15:25 +1100), Mark Andrews wrote: > > Hi, > >> Because /64 only allows for a single subnet running SLAAC with >> currently defined specifications. > > I fully agree that larger than 64 must be allocation, in mobile internet, > residental DSL, everywhere. I don't think it will happen, but I think it > should and I'm happy to say that I was able to impact the national regulatory > authority to include this in their recommendation for how IPv6 should be > provided.
Sadly there are pieces of 3GPP that limit LTE to single /64 already. These should, IMHO, be fixed. > Having routable network is only benefit of IPv6 over IPv4, and if we just give > customers connected /64 network, without routing /56 there, then customers > will need NAT. It’s not the only benefit, it is one of many benefits. Owen
