Yep, understood....... in the ipv6 world we are looking at needing a significantly more 'routing' connectivity, than we do in the current ipv4 world.
Thank you. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kenneth Finnegan" <kennethfinnegan2...@gmail.com> > To: "Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>, nanog@nanog.org > Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 12:16:59 AM > Subject: Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out > > > What is the wisdom / reasoning behind needing to give a /56 to a > > Residential customer (vs a /64). > > What happens when the resident pulls their car into their garage and > their car requests a unique /64 so the various computers on the CAN > can start syncing with the Internet? Car's media center starts > downloading new music, engine controller uploads diagnostics, GPS > navigator starts downloading new maps, etc. > > Different example: people like Jim Gettys and Dave Taht are pushing > for consumer routers to start routing between WiFi and Ethernet > instead of bridging the two out of the box, since WiFi tends to fall > over so hard on multicast/broadcast traffic. Suddenly their router > needs two subnets, and either one of them doesn't work, or they have > to live with reduced WiFi performance. > -- > Kenneth Finnegan > http://blog.thelifeofkenneth.com/ >
