> On Mar 28, 2014, at 5:27 AM, "Randy Bush" <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > > john, > > i think your attemt to move the discussion to the arin ppml list > exemplifies one core of the problem.
Randy - I offered ppml out of respect to the nanog subscribers, that is all... /John > > > > and this is aside from daniel's global measurement empire. not sure it > is a registry's job to do this, but it is a serious contribution to the > internet. > > the ncc is engaged with its community on the subhects that actually > interest operators and affect our daily lives. > > there is nothing of interest at an arin meeting, a bunch of junior > wannabe regulators and vigilantes making an embarrassing mess. i've > even taken to skipping nanog, if ras talks i can watch the recording. > all the cool kids will be in warsaw. ops vote with our feet. > > ran
