On 5/1/12, Patrick W. Gilmore <patr...@ianai.net> wrote: > I love the fact Dominik says "from a CDN", then leaves Limelight's name in > the text. :) [snip]
So a CDN made the mistake of attempting to monetize an existing peering arrangement without first having a signed peering arrangement in place for the existing peering with a Mutual NDA prohibiting any dissemination details of any of their communications/ future negotiations/etc of peering arrangement or traffic exchanged to unrelated third parties?? The lack of a NDA that would prohibit identifying a CDN and their e-mail notification of depeering, whether their name was mentioned or not, sounds quite un-Tier1 like to me. -- -JH
