Let's keep our eye on the ball, people. Did the original post have any operational consequences?
IMHO, it has many. Some are even interesting to the wider audience. So why are we discussing how you bill the US gov't? -- TTFN, patrick P.S. Bill, it is clear you have a point, but you are really stretching it. And it is not relevant to the discussion at hand. On May 1, 2012, at 17:13 , Mike Hale wrote: > "If one of the customers happens to be the U.S. Government, it's not > only unethical it's a crime. It's usually a felony. You can do time. > The product was man hours. You've sold them once. You can't sell them > again." > You're assuming the contract is simply for work hours. Generally > speaking, and from my experience, it isn't. The contract is for an > app that does X, not 20 hours toward building an app that does X. [snip]
