On 4/26/12, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > On Apr 26, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Jack Bates wrote: >> It is unreasonable to require detailed customer information on /32 static >> assignments which make up the smallest fraction of space compared to the >> huge blocks of dhcp pools (pools which justify allocations on their own). >> In addition, a few show commands on a router displaying arp (with first 6 >> filtered) or ppp sessions (with username filtered) or dhcp pool printouts >> showing utilization would make much more sense and provide better "proof" >> of utilization then handing out private resident names of the <10% static >> /32 utilization pool. > > /32s are not required. Get over it.
Hi Owen, John Curran says otherwise. http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2012-April/024518.html http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2012-April/024523.html Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
