On Apr 26, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Jack Bates wrote: > On 4/26/2012 1:05 AM, Jimmy Hess wrote: >> If resources are used to provide service to a customer, it is not >> unreasonable that ARIN require that this to be shown, what customer, >> etc -- the org. assigning or reallocating the resources is required >> to have documented this. >> >> In addition to this documentation, for reallocations of /29 or more >> IPs, SWIP or Rwhois is also required by policy. > > It is unreasonable to require detailed customer information on /32 static > assignments which make up the smallest fraction of space compared to the huge > blocks of dhcp pools (pools which justify allocations on their own). In > addition, a few show commands on a router displaying arp (with first 6 > filtered) or ppp sessions (with username filtered) or dhcp pool printouts > showing utilization would make much more sense and provide better "proof" of > utilization then handing out private resident names of the <10% static /32 > utilization pool. >
/32s are not required. Get over it. /29 and larger. > For management statics, the same applies. A couple arp table captures > generally should provide enough proof of utilization. > > If ARIN really wants to be uptight about it, they can do what all the vendors > do and set up a meeting session to watch us type the commands. This is > probably the hardest method to forge. > > I have not argued about any /29 or greater assignment which should be SWIP'd. > > Someone else in the thread complained that someone would be vague information > in a SWIP concerning a customer, but I see it's still listed under > 4.2.3.7.3.2. So the NRPM still apparently recognizes the need for Residential > privacy as long as upstream contacts are available to handle abuse/technical > contact. > The other person spoke of classes of businesses so the residential privacy policy would not apply. Owen
