So you're suggesting that hosting companies do what?

How many emails or port 25/587 connections a (day, week, hour) makes someone a 
spammer if there are no objections being lodged at the abuse department?

Are we supposed to do DPI on every email that a dedicated server sends out and 
then decide whether it's spam?

My point is if a list has a problem with a /32 they could have the courtesy to 
contact the ISP/host prior to causing huge problems for a /24

I'm not sure what more can be done than having an abuse department staffed up 
and checking all published data before accepting a customer.

And I'm mostly just complaining about senderbase, because they seem to be the 
one that really large companies reference.

Thanks,
-Drew


-----Original Message-----
From: wher...@gmail.com [mailto:wher...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of William Herrin
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 12:56 PM
To: Drew Weaver
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: SORBS?!

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Drew Weaver <drew.wea...@thenap.com> wrote:
> That's just not true, we would much rather be notified of something 
>that a reputation list finds objectionable and take it down ourselves 
>than have Senderbase set a poor reputation on dozens of IaaS customers.

I think the idea is that you're supposed to proactively monitor your systems 
for abuse and generally make your network inhospitable to spammers, not just 
reactively move the customer to a new IP address when the unpaid anti-spammers 
kindly let you know you've been detected.

Personally I see SORBS as the canary in the coal mine. Except for the DUHL 
(which identifies dynamic IPs, not spamming activity) nobody serious relies on 
SORBS' data. So, it doesn't much hurt when they list you. But, like the canary 
that dies first if the air turns bad, if you're careful to watch SORBS you know 
when you're headed for problems which will get you listed by a real RBL.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



--
William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.comĀ  b...@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls 
Church, VA 22042-3004

Reply via email to