That is again, not true. Senderbase's listings don't correlate to any public information so it's pretty much impossible to pro-actively protect ourselves from having our IPs set to poor.
I.e. when Senderbase assigns IPs to poor, those same IPs aren't listed on any RBLs or anything. They operate in a vacuum where there is no visibility into why they do anything. Unlike organizations like Spamhaus where you know exactly why IPs are listed. Thanks, -Drew -----Original Message----- From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu] Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 9:48 AM To: Drew Weaver Cc: 'goe...@anime.net'; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: SORBS?! On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 07:31:47 -0400, Drew Weaver said: > That's just not true, we would much rather be notified of something > that a reputation list finds objectionable and take it down ourselves > than have Senderbase set a poor reputation on dozens of IaaS customers. If it was industry-wide standard practice that just notifying a provider resulted in something being done, we'd not need things like Senderbase, which is after all basically a list of people who don't take action when notified...
