On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 09:55:35 -0400, Drew Weaver said: > That is again, not true. > > Senderbase's listings don't correlate to any public information so it's pretty > much impossible to pro-actively protect ourselves from having our IPs set to > poor.
You missed the point - if it was industry standard practice, reputation lists at Senderbase, Spamhaus, and SORBS would *all 3* be out of business, because the average spammer's lifespan at a provider would be less than the time it takes the average reputation list to put up an entry.
pgpyOe35QJ6E1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
