>>> From: Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> >>> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 >>> naysayer...) >>> Date: February 21, 2011 9:00:50 PM EST >>> To: Dan Wing <dw...@cisco.com> >>> Cc: 'NANOG list' <nanog@nanog.org>, 'ARIN-PPML List' <arin-p...@arin.net> >>> >>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-donley-nat444-impacts-01 >>>> That document conflates problems of NAT444 with problems of NAT44 >>>> with problems of bandwidth starvation with problems of CGN. >>> >>> it may require a delicate palate to differentiate the different flavors >>> of <bleep> >>> >>> randy > > sorry, it looks like six months ago i hit reply to a message where ppml > was cc:ed. as i was not a ppml subscriber, i presume it did not even > make it to the ppml list. > > randy
oh, and i did propose an alternative solution to the problems of which the above complained. see rfc 6346. randy
