>> From: Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com>
>> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for  an      IPv6    
>> naysayer...)
>> Date: February 21, 2011 9:00:50 PM EST
>> To: Dan Wing <dw...@cisco.com>
>> Cc: 'NANOG list' <nanog@nanog.org>, 'ARIN-PPML List' <arin-p...@arin.net>
>> 
>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-donley-nat444-impacts-01
>>> That document conflates problems of NAT444 with problems of NAT44 
>>> with problems of bandwidth starvation with problems of CGN.
>> 
>> it may require a delicate palate to differentiate the different flavors
>> of <bleep>
>> 
>> randy

sorry, it looks like six months ago i hit reply to a message where ppml
was cc:ed.  as i was not a ppml subscriber, i presume it did not even
make it to the ppml list.

randy

Reply via email to