On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 4:16 PM Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
> Verizon Wireless does have v6. I see a 100.64/24 on my phone all the time. > > wireless != wired/internet/fios/dsl Verizon, as I noted elsewhere, in the wired network (as701 / 702 / 703, mostly these days) supported v6 in ~2005 across the entire backbone(s). This technology never seems to have trickled down to the residential (consumer and small business) edge. > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 4:11 PM John Covici <cov...@ccs.covici.com> wrote: > >> Verizon does not support ipv6 as far as I know, I have fios and they >> said it was not supported. >> >> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:20:48 -0500, >> John Levine wrote: >> > >> > It appears that Joe Maimon <jmai...@jmaimon.com> said: >> > >higher penetration of native v6, I would restate that a bit more >> > >conservatively as >> > > >> > >Google's statistics are likely a fair barometer for USA usage in the >> > >large content provider arena which have a strong mobile representation. >> > >> > AT&T, Comcast, and Charter/Spectrum, the three largest cable companies, >> have IPv6 >> > support. I expect a lot of Google searches and Gmail messages come >> from them, too. >> > >> > I think it's more accurate to say that large networks have looked at the >> > costs and implemented IPv6. Small networks, many of which have no need >> > to expand beyond their existing IPv4 allocations, largely have not. >> > >> > Of course, there are a lot more small networks than large ones, even >> though >> > they don't necessarily represent many users, so guess who we hear from? >> > >> > R"s, >> > John >> >> -- >> Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: >> How do >> you spend it? >> >> John Covici wb2una >> cov...@ccs.covici.com >> >
