Thorsten Haude said: > * -dsr- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-06-06 20:34]: > >maildrop has a simpler configuration language than procmail, but is again > >not quite as powerful. > Since I am one of the most vocal Supporters of Maildrop, I would be > interested to hear some examples where Procmail can do more. > > (Background: I used Procmail for a few years, then went looking for an > alternative. I found Maildrop, liked it, but found Mail::Audit much > more powerful, so I never used Maildrop.)
...whereas I use procmail at work and maildrop at home. The primary example of procmail's power is the ability to create, call and distribute modules. If it were only a bit more powerful, one could managed named functions and procedures, which would be nice, but at that point, one might as well go to Mail::Audit and have all of Perl at your command. -dsr-
