Moin,
* Dairy Wall Limey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-29 20:58]:
>Thorsten Haude wrote:
>> Yeah, the basic brain-dead-mailer-problem and its reply-to-munging or
>> group-reply answer. Fortunately, there's Mutt. I use group-reply about
>> once a year.
>> I don't know why I didn't get it the first time.
>>
>> Dairy, you could set the Reply-To header, this is more widely honored
>> than Mail-Followup-To.
>> Ah. I guess they would hit group-reply anyway.
>not only that, but Reply-To is already being set by the mailing list :(
>(yeah i know.....) so the problem is people using group reply in their
>mailer.
Are you the mailing list admin? You could silenty un-munge Reply-To,
then, after a few weeks, announce that you finally found a way that
everyone can use 'reply'.
>the thing i like about 'Mail-Followup-To' (or at least mutt's
>implementation of it) is that hitting group-reply, reply, or list
>reply will always use the correct reply address (ie it honors the
>_sender's_ preferences).
Reply-To is also intended to be set by the sender, it's only raped to
Outlooker's needs so often that a second Header was needed.
Thorsten
--
Denn ein Tyrann ist nicht, wenn die Masse nicht geduldig stillhält.
- Kurt Tucholsky
