Moin,
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-29 16:32]:
>% I don't know why I didn't get it the first time.
>Probably because you're used to using mutt ;-)
Not really, I let myself slip into a pretty heated discussion about
Reply-To munging in another mailing list once. But yes, Mutt make it
easy to forget it.
>% Dairy, you could set the Reply-To header, this is more widely honored
>% than Mail-Followup-To.
>% Ah. I guess they would hit group-reply anyway.
>And they probably wouldn't even have the lovely "reply to <addr>?" prompt
>that mutt has, either :-)/2
I don't see this. I ignore Reply-To in munging mailing lists and honor
it else. You gotta love Mutt.
It just occured to me that Pine only has to support Mutt's
send-hook ~l 'my_hdr Reply-To: some@address'
or am I missing something? With time and patience, the Piners could be
made to use a simple 'reply' then.
Thorsten
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
- Benjamin Franklin
