> > Aha -- you want more than just the URL, then, because of "deficiencies" in
> > the /. mail message, right?  In that case, you'll want to just pump your
> > message through a browser that can pick up the plaintext URLs (though,
> > since you're in a tough boat anyway, you might see if /. offers an HTML
> > mail version and get it instead).  Try w3m and links, two text-mode
> > browsers that seem to be fairly capable.
> 
> BTW, it's lynx, not links.  Sounds like a nitpick, but if the poor guy was
> going to do a search on 'links', it wouldn't get him very far.

 $ man links

NAME
     links - lynx-like alternative character mode WWW browser

[...]

 HTH. HAND.

Reply via email to