On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, David McNett wrote:

> On 11-Sep-2000, Myrddin wrote:
> >BTW, it's lynx, not links.  Sounds like a nitpick, but if the poor guy
> >was going to do a search on 'links', it wouldn't get him very far.
> 
> Actually, it is links.  lynx seems to have fallen into disfavor lately
> in reaction to several recent security issues.  Many people have chosen

..which were fixed months ago.  Same bugs apply to links and w3m, btw.

> to migrate to w3m or links which appear to be more secure and are
> functionally superior to lynx in nearly all regards.

( your opinion ;-)

-- 
T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com

Reply via email to