On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, David McNett wrote: > On 11-Sep-2000, Myrddin wrote: > >BTW, it's lynx, not links. Sounds like a nitpick, but if the poor guy > >was going to do a search on 'links', it wouldn't get him very far. > > Actually, it is links. lynx seems to have fallen into disfavor lately > in reaction to several recent security issues. Many people have chosen ..which were fixed months ago. Same bugs apply to links and w3m, btw. > to migrate to w3m or links which appear to be more secure and are > functionally superior to lynx in nearly all regards. ( your opinion ;-) -- T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dickey.his.com ftp://dickey.his.com
- Re: Mutt's URL support Thomas Dickey
- Re: Mutt's URL support Telsa Gwynne
- Re: Mutt's URL support Thomas Dickey
- Re: Mutt's URL support Jens Askengren
- Re: Mutt's URL support David T-G
- Re: Mutt's URL support Myrddin
- Re: Mutt's URL support Lars Hecking
- Re: Mutt's URL support Myrddin
- Re: Mutt's URL support Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: Mutt's URL support David McNett
- Re: Mutt's URL support Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: Mutt's URL support Brian Foley
- Re: Mutt's URL support Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: Mutt's URL support Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: Mutt's URL support David McNett
- Re: Mutt's URL support Thomas Dickey
- Re: Mutt's URL support David McNett
- Re: Mutt's URL support Thomas Dickey
- Re: Mutt's URL support Thomas Dickey
- Re: Mutt's URL support Pedro Alves
- Re: Mutt's URL support Rob Reid