On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 08:14:32AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > > doc/manual.txt may be there, but for reading on line and searching it is > nearly useless. It appears to be designed to throw at a printer. The ^h_ > stuff for underlining makes it impossible to read headlines, and makes > searches difficult because you may have to search twice. How about also Try midnight commander (mc). It views well and searches rapidly. It's an excellent tool, much like Norton Commander for DOS, only more powerful (e.g., it does ftp so remote files appear to be local). -rex -- I started out with nothing, and I still have most of it.
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt file Charles Curley
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt file Lars Hecking
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt ... Charles Curley
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.... Charles Curley
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.... Sam Roberts
- Re: bold and underline in manual.txt David T-G
- Re: bold and underline in manual.tx... Charles Curley
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt file Bruce Richardson
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt file Ronny Haryanto
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt ... Charles Curley
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt file rex
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt file Jeremy Blosser
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt ... Erik Jacobsen
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt file Sam Roberts
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt file Sam Roberts