On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 08:14:32AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > > doc/manual.txt may be there, but for reading on line and searching it is > nearly useless. It appears to be designed to throw at a printer. The ^h_ > stuff for underlining makes it impossible to read headlines, and makes > searches difficult because you may have to search twice. How about also > including the manual as html? Have you not tried using less to read it? If you want to read it on a windows box or in a GUI text editor then do this first on Linux: cat manual.txt | col -b | newman.txt -- Bruce "I see a mouse." "Where?" "There on the stair. And its clumsy wooden footwear makes it easy to trap and kill." - Harry Hill
- mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt file kromJx
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt file Gero Treuner
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt file Charles Curley
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt ... Lars Hecking
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.... Charles Curley
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the ma... Charles Curley
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the ma... Sam Roberts
- Re: bold and underline in manual.tx... David T-G
- Re: bold and underline in manua... Charles Curley
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt ... Bruce Richardson
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt ... Ronny Haryanto
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.... Charles Curley
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt ... rex
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt ... Jeremy Blosser
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.... Erik Jacobsen
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt file Sam Roberts
- Re: mutt-1.1.10: looking for the manual.txt file Sam Roberts