Re: Y100 (was: mutt & y2k)

[Thomas Roessler]

On 2000-01-04 10:40:46 +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:

> The year 100 is converted by date_format="%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %Z"
> to 2000. Problem of mutt or of strftime?

I wouldn't really consider this a problem - after all, it cought
quite a bit of y2k-related nonsense emitted by other software, and,
in addition, year numbers less then 1978 (?) can't legitimately
appear in RFC 822 messages. ;-)

-- 
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/