On 2000-01-01 19:12:28 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Mutt as a small y2k problem on the receiving end. While mutt works
> just fine with four-digit year numbers, RFC 822 originally specifies
> two-digit year numbers, which still seem to be permitted. (Not that
> any one should be using them nowadays... However, at least one user
> seems to have stumbled over them in the wild already.)
The year 100 is converted by date_format="%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %Z" to
2000. Problem of mutt or of strftime?
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
PGP signature
