[EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It isn't at all. Mostly we were talking about people using other mailers
> > (like Pine) not because they liked the features the most but out of
> > inertia. As I said, *if we care*, there are things we could try to do
> > about this. If we don't care, we ignore it.
>
> It is possible that some people actually like Pine better than
> Mutt, as absurd as that seems to us ;) If they really don't like
> it, they'll find something else (like I did).
Yes, it's possible: my point was that the "good things" about Pine people
were mentioning were things Mutt does quite well as well. And if "easy
telnet/ssh access on modem lines" is their main issue (it's the one the
were mentioning the most) then Mutt could easily be better for them since
it's less bloated and faster.
But yeah, people that really care and want something better will go
looking.
--
Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://jblosser.firinn.org/
-----------------+-------------------------+------------------------------
"Would you fight to the death, for that which you love?
In a cause surely hopeless ...for that which you love?"
-- D. McKiernan, _Dragondoom_
PGP signature
