I would appreciate if mails to the list are only PGP signed if they address patches or other distribution details. I would also like to suggest that everyone restricts their PGP signatures to version 2.x. Many people have not upgraded to PGP 5/6 for various reasons, and have no intention to in the near future. This is simply annoying, even more so if the actual message content is low/mostly irrelevant. > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Thu Feb 18 16:17:07 1999) --] > Warning: Unrecognized ASCII armor header label "MessageID:" ignored. > > ^GUnsupported packet format - you need a newer version of PGP for this file. > > For a usage summary, type: pgp -h > For more detailed help, consult the PGP User's Guide. > [-- End of PGP output --]
- Bug report: quota limit/no disk space Andreas Jaekel
- Re: Bug report: quota limit/no disk space Thomas Roessler
- Re: Bug report: quota limit/no disk space Andreas Jaekel
- Re: Bug report: quota limit/no disk space David Thorburn-Gundlach
- Re: Bug report: quota limit/no disk space Andreas Jaekel
- Re: Bug report: quota limit/no disk s... David Thorburn-Gundlach
- Re: PGP signed mails to the list Lars Hecking
- Re: PGP signed mails to the ... J. Lasser
- Re: PGP signed mails to ... Mark Bainter
- Re: PGP signed mails to ... Rob Reid
- How did you do...? R... homega
- Re: Bold and underli... Rob Reid
- Re: Bold and underli... Brandon Long
- Re: Bold and underli... rfi from Rich Roth
- Re: Bold and underli... Thomas Roessler
- Re: PGP signed mails to the ... David Thorburn-Gundlach
- Re: PGP signed mails to the ... Jeremy Blosser