On 16Jun2007 12:46, Mike Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | What do people think about allowing the user to specify in their muttrc | what values do and do not constitute a fatal error coming from their | editor?
It's needless: #!/bin/sh real-editor ${1+"$@"} xit=$? case $xit in 3|4) xit=0 ;; esac exit $xit | It seems to me mutt *should* react if it is told there's been a | fatal editor failure, and given that the standard means of communicating | such an error has occurred is inherently broken, we should allow for | another means. A simple "notice-editor-failure" boolean setting would be plenty, and probably desirable given the flamewar. Fine tuning can be done with a script as above, but yes-I-care,no-I-don't would cover a lot of users. Cheers, -- Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ No, Sir. I don't think its safe to look at the speedometer when I'm going that fast. - Tom Coradeschi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>