On 2007-06-15 17:18:14 -0400, Jean-Pierre Radley wrote: > Vincent Lefevre typed (on Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 04:42:18PM +0200): > | On 2007-06-15 08:19:15 -0400, Derek Martin wrote: > | > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:01:21AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > | > > If your vi regards something like a failed pattern search as > | > > an error, you have to accept that. > | > > | > Nonsense. If Mutt behaves badly dealing with a common application > | > that people use in conjunction with Mutt, especially one Mutt > | > specifically intends to be compatible with (like vi), then Mutt is > | > broken. > | > | Then Mutt should check if the editor command is named vi. > > Too simplistic, since vi in Linux is (always? usually?) vim.
So? -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
