Vincent Lefevre typed (on Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 04:42:18PM +0200):
| On 2007-06-15 08:19:15 -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
| > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:01:21AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
| > > If your vi regards something like a failed pattern search as an error,
| > > you have to accept that.
| >
| > Nonsense. If Mutt behaves badly dealing with a common application
| > that people use in conjunction with Mutt, especially one Mutt
| > specifically intends to be compatible with (like vi), then Mutt is
| > broken.
|
| Then Mutt should check if the editor command is named vi.
Too simplistic, since vi in Linux is (always? usually?) vim.
--
JP
==> http://www.frappr.com/cusm <==
