On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 08:19:15AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:01:21AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > If your vi regards something like a failed pattern search as an error, > > you have to accept that. > > Nonsense. If Mutt behaves badly dealing with a common application > that people use in conjunction with Mutt, especially one Mutt > specifically intends to be compatible with (like vi), then Mutt is > broken. > that's absurd. if you have such an utterly broken program and still want to use it, wrap it in a script. if you lose data then, it's you own fault.
-- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! -- Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
